Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVidal Puga, Juan José 
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T11:41:23Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T11:41:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-11
dc.identifier.citationMathematical Social Sciences, 64(3): 214-224 (2012)spa
dc.identifier.issn01654896
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11093/1147
dc.description.abstractWe describe a coalitional value from a non-cooperative point of view, assuming coalitions are formed for the purpose of bargaining. The idea is that all the players have the same chances to make proposals. This means that players maintain their own "right to talk" when joining a coalition. The resulting value coincides with the weighted Shapley value in the game between coalitions, with weights given by the size of the coalitions. Moreover, the Harsanyi paradox (forming a coalition may be disadvantageous) disappears for convex games.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherMathematical Social Sciencesspa
dc.titleThe Harsanyi paradox and the “right to talk” in bargaining among coalitionsen
dc.typearticlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.05.002
dc.identifier.editorhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165489612000431spa
dc.publisher.departamentoEstatística e investigación operativaspa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionResearch Group In Economic Analysisspa
dc.subject.unesco1207.06 Teoría de Juegosspa
dc.date.updated2019-01-15T11:16:35Z
dc.computerCitationpub_title=Mathematical Social Sciences|volume=64|journal_number=3|start_pag=214|end_pag=224spa


Files in this item

[PDF]

    Show simple item record