Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarcala Furelos, Roberto Jesus 
dc.contributor.authorBarcala Furelos, Martín
dc.contributor.authorCano Noguera, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorOtero Agra, Martín 
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Calvete, Alejandra 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Isasi, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorAranda García, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorLópez García, Sergio 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Núñez, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T12:28:05Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T12:28:05Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-17
dc.identifier.citationChildren, 9(6): 910 (2022)spa
dc.identifier.issn22279067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11093/3642
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare the quality of CPR (Q-CPR), as well as the perceived fatigue and hand pain in a prolonged infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by lifeguards using three different techniques. A randomized crossover simulation study was used to compare three infant CPR techniques: the two-finger technique (TF); the two-thumb encircling technique (TTE) and the two-thumb-fist technique (TTF). 58 professional lifeguards performed three tests in pairs during a 20-min period of CPR. The rescuers performed compressions and ventilations in 15:2 cycles and changed their roles every 2 min. The variables of analysis were CPR quality components, rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and hand pain with numeric rating scale (NRS). All three techniques showed high Q-CPR results (TF: 86 ± 9%/TTE: 88 ± 9%/TTF: 86 ± 16%), and the TTE showed higher values than the TF (p = 0.03). In the RPE analysis, fatigue was not excessive with any of the three techniques (values 20 min between 3.2 for TF, 2.4 in TTE and 2.5 in TTF on a 10-point scale). TF reached a higher value in RPE than TTF in all the intervals analyzed (p < 0.05). In relation to NRS, TF showed significantly higher values than TTE and TTF (NRS minute 20 = TF 4.7 vs. TTE 2.5 & TTF 2.2; p < 0.001). In conclusion, all techniques have been shown to be effective in high-quality infant CPR in a prolonged resuscitation carried out by lifeguards. However, the two-finger technique is less efficient in relation to fatigue and hand pain compared with two-thumb technique (TF vs. TTF, p = 0.01).en
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherChildrenspa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleA comparison between three different techniques considering quality skills, fatigue and hand pain during a prolonged infant resuscitation: a cross-over study with lifeguardsen
dc.typearticlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/children9060910
dc.identifier.editorhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/6/910spa
dc.publisher.departamentoDidácticas especiaisspa
dc.publisher.departamentoBioloxía funcional e ciencias da saúdespa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionEquipo de Investigación en Rendemento e Motricidade do Salvamento e Socorrismospa
dc.subject.unesco2411 Fisiología Humanaspa
dc.subject.unesco2411.03 Fisiología Cardiovascularspa
dc.subject.unesco2411.17 Fisiología de la Respiraciónspa
dc.date.updated2022-06-30T10:53:57Z
dc.computerCitationpub_title=Children|volume=9|journal_number=6|start_pag=910|end_pag=spa


Files in this item

[PDF]

    Show simple item record

    Attribution 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International