dc.contributor.author | Candal Ventureira, David | |
dc.contributor.author | González Castaño, Francisco Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Gil Castiñeira, Felipe Jose | |
dc.contributor.author | Fondo Ferreiro, Pablo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-17T12:27:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-17T12:27:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Software Practice and Experience, 53(3): 579-599 (2023) | spa |
dc.identifier.issn | 00380644 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1097024X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11093/4620 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, we evaluate the first experience of computation offloading from drones to real fifth-generation (5G) operator systems, including commercial and private carrier-grade 5G networks. A follow-me drone service was implemented as a representative testbed of remote video analytics. In this application, an image of a person from a drone camera is processed at the edge, and image tracking displacements are translated into positioning commands that are sent back to the drone, so that the drone keeps the camera focused on the person at all times. The application is characterised to identify the processing and communication contributions to service delay. Then, we evaluate the latency of the application in a real non standalone 5G operator network, a standalone carrier-grade 5G private network, and, to compare these results with previous research, a Wi-Fi wireless local area network. We considered both multi-access edge computing (MEC) and cloud offloading scenarios. Onboard computing was also evaluated to assess the trade-offs with task offloading. The results determine the network configurations that are feasible for the follow-me application use case depending on the mobility of the end user, and to what extent MEC is advantageous over a state-of-the-art cloud service. | spa |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación | Ref. PDC2021‐121335‐C21 | spa |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación | Ref. PRE2021‐098290 | spa |
dc.description.sponsorship | Agencia Estatal de Investigación | Ref. PID2020-116329GB-C21 | spa |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.publisher | Software Practice and Experience | spa |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PDC2021-121335-C21/ES/ | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2020-116329GB-C21/ES/ARISE1: REDES ULTRADENSAS SIN CELDAS (DECK) | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica, Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PRE2021-098290/ES/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Is the edge really necessary for drone computing offloading? An experimental assessment in carrier‐grade 5G operator networks | en |
dc.type | article | spa |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | spa |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/spe.3161 | |
dc.identifier.editor | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spe.3161 | spa |
dc.publisher.departamento | Enxeñaría telemática | spa |
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacion | Grupo de Tecnoloxías da Información | spa |
dc.subject.unesco | 3325.99 Otras | spa |
dc.date.updated | 2023-03-16T10:26:06Z | |
dc.computerCitation | pub_title=Software Practice and Experience|volume=53|journal_number=3|start_pag=579|end_pag=599 | spa |