Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Svante
dc.contributor.authorSvensson, Göran
dc.contributor.authorMolina Castillo, Francisco José
dc.contributor.authorOtero Neira, Maria Del Carmen 
dc.contributor.authorLindgren, John
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Niklas P. E.
dc.contributor.authorLaurell, Hélène
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T13:19:37Z
dc.date.available2024-03-14T13:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.identifier.citationCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5): 1158-1172 (2022)spa
dc.identifier.issn15353958
dc.identifier.issn15353966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11093/6425
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the direct and indirect effects between economic, social and environmental dimensions of triple bottom line (TBL), based on a questionnaire survey and cross-industrial sample in Sweden. The analyses apply partial least squares structural equation models. The study tests the direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions of TBL and offers additional validity and reliability to establish the measurement and structural properties between the dimensions of TBL. The study extends earlier findings by explicitly discussing how the three TBL goals relate to each other and shows how the dynamic capability view can be a fruitful lens to investigate business sustainability. Some differences in sustainability business practices caused by differences in national cultures are identified. Sustainability reporting in a strong uncertainty avoidance (UA) country happens in accordance with regulations and laws. Conversely, for weak UA cultures, reporting and compliance with regulations are ways to build trust with stakeholders. That is, reporting is more transparent and widespread in weak UA countries. The study also provides a foundation to guide companies' actions of business sustainability. The model shows companies how to establish the order of actions undertaken across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. In addition, it clarifies that the economic dimension exerts an effect on the social and environmental dimensions. The model also grasps long-term economic performance by including competitiveness and brand value, while earlier research mainly has focused on more short-term measurements as return on assets.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Managementspa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSustainable development - Direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions in business practiceseng
dc.typearticlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/csr.2261
dc.identifier.editorhttps://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2261spa
dc.publisher.departamentoOrganización de empresas e márketingspa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionMARKETING-VIGOspa
dc.subject.unesco5311 Organización y Dirección de Empresasspa
dc.subject.unesco5311.05 Marketing (Comercialización)spa
dc.date.updated2024-03-14T12:32:41Z
dc.computerCitationpub_title=Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management|volume=29|journal_number=5|start_pag=1158|end_pag=1172spa


Files in this item

[PDF]

    Show simple item record

    Attribution 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International